For Every 1$ spent on food, farmers receive less than 12 cents. The Indian farmers grow banana spending an
average 12 months of effort and sells it for Rs. 30 per kg. The local buyer who buys from the farmers makes it ripe (1 day of effort) , sends to city mandi (main market). From Mandi it goes to distributors, retails and finally it reaches the customers. The time taken from local buyers (who buy from farmers) to reach the customer, it takes 3 or 4 days. The end user buys at the rate of Rs. 70 or 80 per kg. The middle men make Rs. 40 to Rs.50 per kg and the effort is 3 days and the farmer who earns Rs. 30 per kg, the effort is 365 days.
In case of processed food, 12% of the MRP goes to farmers and
remaining 88% goes to the middle men: manufactures,
distributor and retails (US study).
In case of farmers, the effort versus income never matches, he/she only earns 12% (US) from the whole value chain, but the effort is 80% to 90%.
Farmers: Income 12%, effort is 80%
Middle man: Income 88%, effort is 20%.
Farmer can never demand his due base on effort.
In the name of value-add, 80% of the income is being reserved for each entity in the value-chain.
This is probably justifiable, if one has to argue on that. But, what if farmers were to take up significant percent of that effort,
thereby increasing their income too?
Other related problems are:
- Migration - Rural to Urban: As the earnings deplete and unable to make economic sense, famers migrate to cities .
- Unemployment: Farmers are not skilled to do the so-called high-value work and mostly work in a low-paid service sector.
- Cost of Living: Living in city becomes unviable with less income, hence slums are created and live in pathetic and un-hygienic conditions
- Women Employment: Women although are equal partners in agriculture, their role is under appreciated. And with the migration, they again take up low-paid service jobs.
Question #1 is, can we achieve growth around local economy?